LAB set a new all-time high after a sharp rise on low available token volume. Over the past day, the asset rose by about 67% and reached $16.24 on June 1, pushing its market cap above $4.66 billion.
The growth looks strong on the chart, but the supply structure makes the situation more complicated. Most early holders cannot sell tokens due to vesting schedules, and only about 31% of the maximum supply is in circulation. As a result, some investors see multimillion-dollar profits only on paper.
LAB Rally Occurred Amid Limited Supply
According to CoinGecko, LAB rose about 240% over seven days and added around 656% in 30 days. At the time of the source’s publication, the token was trading around $14.51, with a daily trading volume of $223 million.
The maximum supply of LAB is 1 billion tokens. About 312 million coins are in circulation, which is roughly 31% of the total. The rest is distributed among the team, investors, public sale participants, and ecosystem programs, but a significant portion remains locked.
This structure amplifies price movements. When only part of the supply is available on the market, even moderate demand can lead to a sharp rise. At the same time, the market cap increases quickly, although real liquidity may remain limited.
Fully Diluted Valuation Approached $15 Billion
After the rise, LAB entered the top 25 crypto assets by market capitalization. The project’s fully diluted valuation approached $14.9 billion.
This metric is important for assessing future risks. Market capitalization only counts tokens in circulation, while fully diluted valuation considers the entire possible supply. The bigger the gap between these metrics, the more the market depends on future unlocks.
For LAB, this gap has become a key topic. The current price is formed on a relatively small volume of available coins, while the bulk of the supply has not yet hit the market. This creates a situation where the chart looks powerful, but the sustainability of the growth depends on the behavior of locked holders.
Holders See Profits but Cannot Cash Out
The main feature of LAB is that many early participants cannot lock in gains. Their tokens remain subject to cliff and linear vesting. This applies to part of the team, early investors, and public sale participants.
Formally, such holders can see large profits at the current price. In practice, they do not have access to the tokens or cannot freely sell them on the market. Therefore, the growth turns into unrealized income and dependence on future unlock dates.
Some participants, according to the source, are already trying to sell stakes through over-the-counter deals. Discounts of about 90% and additional short lockups for buyers have been reported. This shows that some investors are willing to exit at a steep discount to the market price just to get liquidity before official unlocks.
Unlocks Become the Main Risk
The market has already seen similar scenarios. Low token circulation often supports growth in the early stage, but unlocks change the balance. When new volumes hit the market, the price faces selling from those who could not lock in profits for a long time.
According to one trader, participants with locked shares try to hedge positions but cannot always protect themselves from liquidations. This situation arises when the price rises quickly and access to the underlying asset is limited. As a result, an investor may have profits on paper but no simple way to manage risk.
It was reported that the first major unlocks could begin in July or August. These are the windows the market will watch especially closely. If a significant volume of tokens hits the market, the current price structure will face a serious test.
The Fund May Have Postponed Unlock Dates
Separate questions were raised by reports of a possible postponement of the unlock schedule. Investor Simon Dedic stated that, according to insiders, the fund had already changed LAB’s vesting terms to support growth. The next unlock, it is claimed, was postponed to August.
If such changes did occur, this intensifies the debate around the project’s transparency. For investors, the unlock schedule is one of the key parameters for evaluating a token. When dates change, the market has a harder time understanding the real volume of future supply.
This is especially sensitive for assets with a low share of tokens in circulation. Any change to the schedule can not only support the price in the short term but also increase the risk of a sharper correction later. Deferred supply does not disappear; it is simply moved to future dates.
ZachXBT Points to Token Concentration
Blockchain researcher ZachXBT pointed out the opaque distribution of LAB and possible control of a significant portion of the supply by insiders. By his estimate, through OTC deals, private sales, airdrops, market makers, and team wallets, insiders may control more than 95% of the available supply.
He also drew attention to private loans, OTC deals, vesting changes, coordination with market makers, and the unknown real volume of available tokens. These claims have become one of the main factors of distrust toward the current rally.
If the concentration is really that high, the LAB market could be vulnerable to sharp moves. With a limited number of large holders, the price depends not only on retail investor demand but also on the decisions of a few participants with access to large volumes.
LAB Supporters Point to Platform Usage
Project supporters believe that LAB’s growth is not only due to low supply. They point to platform activity on BNB Chain, Solana, and Ethereum networks, the launch of a mobile app, and a rewards program.
They also cite the revenue distribution model and token buybacks in favor of the project. By this logic, a high valuation may be justified if the platform is truly growing users, fees, and sustainable cash flows.
However, for the market, this is not yet enough to answer all the questions. With such a supply structure, even a strong product does not eliminate the risks of unlocks and token concentration. Investors will look not only at platform metrics but also at who controls the supply and when new tokens can enter the market.
LAB Becomes an Example of a New Listing Problem
The LAB story fits into a broader debate about new tokens with a low share of supply in circulation. Such assets can rise quickly after launch because few coins are available on the market. At the same time, the fully diluted valuation immediately becomes high.
The problem appears later. When tokens of early investors, the team, and ecosystem funds start to unlock, the market gets a new supply volume. If demand does not grow at the same pace, the price can fall quickly.
Market research has already pointed to signs of insider activity in a significant share of new listings after 2021. Therefore, the LAB case is seen not as a separate anomaly but as part of a systemic problem. Low circulation, high interest, and opaque distributions create grounds for conflict between early participants and the open market.
What Happens Next?
The key dates for LAB fall in July and August, when the market will await the first major unlocks. If supply hits the market in significant volume, the current valuation will face a liquidity test.
For now, LAB’s record can be explained in two ways. The first scenario assumes that the growth reflects real demand for the platform and its future revenues. The second points to a temporary shortage of available tokens, which amplified the price movement amid low liquidity.
The difference between these scenarios will become clear after the unlocks. If new volumes are absorbed by the market, LAB will be able to secure its status as a major asset. If holders start locking in profits en masse, the current high could turn out to be a peak created by limited supply.
Read More: Strategy Bitcoin Sale Sparks Debate on Polymarket
