The European Union has proposed banning operations on 11 crypto platforms as part of a new sanctions package against Russia. The measures are included in the 21st package of restrictions and are intended to strengthen control over financial channels that, according to Brussels, could be used to circumvent existing bans.
The new restrictions affect not only the crypto market. The package also includes banks, arms manufacturers, oil traders, processing companies, and entities outside the EU. This shows that European authorities are expanding sanction pressure from traditional finance and energy to digital assets.
Crypto Services Included in Sanctions Agenda
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas stated that the EU plans to tighten the ban on crypto services for certain third countries. It is also proposed to add new sanction positions and ban transactions on 11 crypto platforms.
The list of platforms has not yet been disclosed. The European Commission has not publicly named the companies that may fall under the restrictions and has not provided additional details before the publication of the material.
This creates uncertainty for the market. If the measures affect specific exchanges, payment services, or related entities, users will have to quickly assess the risks of access, withdrawal of funds, and further work with such platforms.
Brussels Expands List of Targets
According to Ursula von der Leyen, the new package affects 31 Russian banks and another 20 organizations outside the EU. This group includes financial entities, crypto services, and companies involved in oil trading.
Brussels’ logic is simple. The restrictions are now aimed not only at direct participants in the Russian market but also at intermediaries who may have served sanctioned clients or helped circumvent existing measures.
This is an important signal for the crypto industry. Digital assets are increasingly seen by regulators as part of cross-border financial infrastructure, not as a separate market outside sanction policy.
UK Case Became a Warning for Exchanges
Against this backdrop, the UK's move in May against Huobi Global S.A., which is linked to HTX, was indicative. London stated that it had grounds to suspect the company of servicing Russian financial flows.
The UK materials mentioned links to A7 and Garantex. Both entities were already under restrictions, so the case quickly became a benchmark for other regulators.
The trading platform itself denied the accusations. Its position is that the sanctions apply to a separate legal entity, not the active online exchange and its users.
Analyst Data Increased Pressure
Later, attention to the platform increased due to a Global Ledger report. According to analysts, from 2021 to May 2026, about $21 billion in high-risk transactions passed through its related infrastructure.
Part of this volume, at least $7.6 billion, was linked by analysts to Russian high-risk entities and darknet markets. Among the mentioned directions were Garantex, Grinex, A7A5, and Hydra.
For regulators, such data becomes an argument in favor of tough measures. For exchanges, it is a warning: links to sanctioned flows can now lead not only to inspections but also to a complete ban on operations.
Broad Sanctions May Affect Ordinary Users
The tough approach is causing debate among blockchain analysts. Their main argument is that sanctions against an entire platform may hit not only suspicious flows but also ordinary clients.
If a service as a whole is classified as high-risk, compliance systems find it harder to separate illegal transactions from legal ones. This can lead to the freezing of bona fide users and worsen the quality of tracking real violators.
Regulators have a choice between targeted and broad measures. Targeted ones require more analytics but do less harm to legal clients. Broad ones are easier to apply but create more side effects for the market.
Crypto Exchanges Will Face New Pressure
If the EU proposal is approved, international platforms will have to strengthen control over flows related to Russian users and sanctioned entities. This is not only about checking individual addresses but also about stricter assessment of links between platforms, intermediaries, and clients.
For major exchanges, this means higher compliance costs. They will have to identify high-risk transactions more quickly, restrict suspicious routes, and prove to regulators that they are not helping to circumvent sanctions.
For users, the consequences may be practical. Some services may preemptively restrict access, tighten checks, or abandon certain directions to avoid secondary risks.
What's Next?
The EU proposal still needs to be approved. If the package is adopted, operations on 11 crypto platforms will be banned, and sanction pressure on crypto infrastructure related to Russian flows will increase.
The main question now is which platforms will be included in the list. Until the names are revealed, the market will assess risks by analogy with the UK case against HTX and based on data about links to already sanctioned entities.
For the crypto market, this is another signal. Sanction policy is going deeper into digital assets, and exchanges and payment services can no longer expect that on-chain infrastructure will remain outside traditional financial control.
Read More: Bitcoin miners' revenues have fallen to a record low: will BTC stay above $60,000?
