Lighter is preparing to reduce the LIT supply for the first time using the exchange’s revenue. The project will burn about 15.5 million tokens, which is approximately 6.3% of the circulating supply.
This decision is the first practical step after the tokenomics revision in June. Now, the repurchased coins will not accumulate on the platform’s balance. They plan to remove them from circulation with no possibility of recovery.
Burning Will Affect More Than 6% of Circulation
Lighter reported that the amount to be burned was calculated based on buyback programs through the end of Q2 2026. This totals about 15.5 million LIT.
At a price of about $2.54, the value of the package is estimated at around $39 million. For a token with a relatively limited circulating supply, this is a significant reduction.
After the operation is completed, the team will publish the transaction hash on the Ethereum network. This will allow market participants to independently verify the transfer and ensure that the coins have indeed been removed from circulation.
The project also allows for another technical option. Instead of already repurchased tokens, undistributed LIT could be destroyed. From an economic point of view, the team considers both approaches equivalent, since the final supply will decrease by the same amount.
New Model Replaces Storing Tokens in Treasury
The change is related to the tokenomics update presented at the end of June. Previously, coins repurchased with trading fees could remain at the project’s disposal.
Now the logic is changing. Funds received from the exchange’s operations are used to buy back LIT, after which the corresponding amount is removed from the market.
This mechanism differs from the usual redistribution of tokens within the ecosystem. If coins remain in the treasury, they could theoretically re-enter circulation. After burning, this is no longer possible.
For holders, this means a reduction in potential supply. However, this factor alone does not guarantee a price increase. The result will depend on whether demand remains and whether the platform can continue to finance new buybacks.
Buyback Is Backed by Real Fees
Lighter uses revenue from trading activity, not new tokens, for the program. According to DefiLlama, since launch the exchange has received about $69 million in fees.
In the past month, this figure was about $2.8 million. These funds provide the economic basis for the buybacks.
The model looks more sustainable than schemes where a project promises to reduce supply without a clear source of funding. In Lighter’s case, the program’s size is directly tied to how much users pay in trading fees.
The higher the activity on the platform, the more funds can be allocated for future LIT purchases. If trading volume falls, the program’s capacity will be limited.
Lighter Follows the Hyperliquid Approach
A similar model is already used by Hyperliquid. This platform directs part of its commission revenue to buy back HYPE.
According to market estimates, the total volume of such operations has exceeded $1 billion. Strong financial performance and constant demand from the buyback program have been among the factors driving the token’s growth in 2026.
Against this backdrop, the comparison with Hyperliquid is logical. Both platforms tie token economics to trading revenue, not just investor expectations.
However, the scale is still different. Hyperliquid’s revenue and buyback volume are much higher. Lighter is only now moving to the new model, so the market still needs to assess its long-term sustainability.
LIT Price Rose Ahead of Supply Reduction
As of July 10, LIT was trading around $2.54. In 24 hours, the token gained about 8%.
From the March low of about $0.78, the price has more than tripled. Despite the recovery, the asset is still significantly below the December record, when quotes reached $7.86.
This shows that the market has already partially reacted to the tokenomics change and the anticipation of the first burn. However, the distance to the all-time high remains large.
The very fact of removing 15.5 million coins may support interest in the asset. But further dynamics will depend not on a single transaction, but on the repeatability of the mechanism.
Annual Issuance Partially Offsets Reduction
The new model has an important limitation. Alongside burning, the project continues to issue tokens as staking rewards.
Under the current scheme, about 7.5 million LIT are distributed annually. This means that part of the effect from the one-time supply reduction will be offset over time by new issuance.
If we look only at the current operation, the burn volume is about twice the expected annual issuance. However, without new buybacks, the net reduction will not be permanent.
Therefore, it is more important for investors to monitor not only the number of destroyed tokens, but also the balance between issuance and future burns.
If the exchange’s revenue allows for regularly buying back more LIT than is issued as rewards, the supply may gradually decrease. In the opposite scenario, the effect will be temporary.
Exchange Revenue Will Be the Main Indicator
The key question now is the sustainability of revenue. In the past month, commission income has declined slightly.
This is directly relevant for the program. The less revenue the platform receives, the less can be allocated to buybacks.
A single large burn can temporarily improve market sentiment. But a long-term model requires stable trading activity.
If volumes and fees recover, the project will be able to conduct new reductions without additional token issuance. Then, tokenomics will have a permanent link to the exchange’s real financial results.
If revenue continues to decline, the program will become less noticeable, and price growth will depend more on the overall market situation.
What Could Support Further LIT Growth
A single supply reduction is not enough for continued growth. The market will need confirmation that the new model works regularly.
The first such signal will be the publication of the transaction in Ethereum. This will confirm the operation’s completion and remove doubts about the actual execution of the decision.
The next stage is linked to the exchange’s financial performance. Market participants will assess trading volume, commission revenue, and the size of future buybacks.
The pace of issuance is also important. The more buybacks exceed new distributions, the more noticeable the program’s impact on overall supply will be.
So far, Lighter has only taken the first step. Burning 6.3% of circulation looks significant, but the model’s sustainability will become clear after several quarters.
Bottom Line
The first LIT burn will be the largest supply change since launch. The platform will remove about 15.5 million coins bought with trading fees.
The supply reduction creates a positive backdrop, especially as the price recovers from March lows. At the same time, annual staking rewards will return some tokens to the market.
Further dynamics depend on Lighter’s revenue. If trading fees allow for regular buyback funding, the new tokenomics could become a long-term source of demand. A single operation does not guarantee this effect.
Read more: AVAX One Retained Nasdaq Listing After Stock Recovery
